Choosing a mortgage professional

Mortgage brokers vs. direct lenders: what Ontario borrowers should verify

A broker helps arrange a mortgage; the lender decides whether to approve it. Before choosing a channel, verify licensing, representation, lender access and compensation.

A mortgage broker or agent helps arrange your mortgage by negotiating with lenders and gathering and submitting your application; the lender decides whether to approve it.[E2] Borrowing directly means dealing with the lender rather than using that intermediary. For Ontario borrowers, the key checks when using a broker are licensing, whom they represent, which lenders they work with and how they are compensated.[E1][E2] The guidance available here does not establish that either channel is cheaper, faster or more likely to approve you.

Separate the arranger from the lender

A broker’s role in preparing and negotiating an application is different from the lender’s approval role.[E2] Treat a broker’s recommendation as a recommendation—not as a lender’s commitment to approve your mortgage.

“Lender” also does not mean only a bank. FSRA lists credit unions, loan and trust corporations, life insurance companies, pension funds, and private organizations, individuals or groups among possible mortgage lenders.[E2] That list does not establish that these lenders offer the same products or operate under identical rules.

The practical question is therefore not simply “broker or bank?” It is: Who is arranging the mortgage, who is making the lending decision, and what choices are actually being considered?

Check the broker’s reach and relationships

Before asking a broker to proceed, get clear answers to these questions:

  • How many lenders do you work with, and which do you typically use? These are questions FSRA recommends asking.[E2] Do not assume a broker searches the entire market.
  • Do you represent me, the lender, or both? FSRA explicitly identifies all three possibilities in its consumer guidance.[E2] Do not assume the broker acts exclusively for you.
  • Does the brokerage share ownership with the recommended lender? FSRA’s disclosure discussion identifies shared ownership as a relationship borrowers should understand.[E3]
  • How concentrated is the brokerage’s business? FSRA’s disclosure discussion highlights whether more than 50 per cent of the brokerage’s new mortgages and renewals in the previous fiscal year went to one lender.[E3]

Shared ownership or concentrated lender use does not, by itself, establish that a recommendation is unsuitable. As a decision check, ask why the recommended lender fits your circumstances and what alternatives the broker considered. The answers help you judge the value of the intermediary’s selection and explanation—not just the number of lenders named.

Verify licensing, scope and payment before committing

Licensing and the work being offered

In Ontario, individuals and businesses carrying out regulated mortgage brokering activities must be licensed by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Ontario (FSRA), unless exempted under the Mortgage Brokerages, Lenders and Administrators Act, 2006.[E1] Verify the licensing status of the professional and brokerage you plan to use. This requirement should not be read as saying every direct lender needs the same licence; the supplied guidance does not explain the exemptions.

Ask what work the broker or agent will do, what you must do, and whether you need to sign a contract. FSRA recommends establishing these points before you begin working together.[E2] As a practical next step, ask for those answers in writing so you can compare them with any agreement you are asked to sign.

Compensation and charges

Ask how the broker or agent is compensated and what broker charges or fees apply.[E2] Clarify who pays, what you would owe and who would receive any payment. FSRA states that fees or other remuneration cannot be paid directly to individual brokers or agents.[E3]

The evidence does not establish a standard fee amount, who pays in your transaction, or whether using a broker costs more or less than borrowing directly. Compare the actual written charges and compensation explanations rather than assuming either channel is free or less expensive.

Personal and financial information

Ask what information is needed and how it will be used.[E2] FSRA’s general documentation guidance includes income or employment confirmation, banking information, down-payment evidence, assets and liabilities, and the property address.[E2] This is not an exhaustive checklist for every lender or application. Establish the scope of the relationship and the intended use of your information before proceeding.

Know what regulatory protection does—and does not—mean

FSRA says it can review complaints with the consumer’s consent and take regulatory action where sufficient supporting evidence exists. It cannot resolve contractual disputes, provide compensation or recover funds for consumers.[E1] Licensing and regulatory oversight therefore should not be treated as a guarantee that a financial loss can be reimbursed through a complaint.

A practical rule for choosing your next step

Proceed with a broker only when you can explain, in your own words, whom they represent, which lenders they are considering, why they recommend a particular lender, what work they will do and what you may have to pay. If an answer is unclear, resolve it before committing.

If you are also considering a direct lender, obtain its own written explanation of the proposed mortgage and any borrower charges. Do not apply broker-specific licensing, compensation or disclosure guidance to that lender without checking what applies. Choose based on the actual proposal and a clearly understood relationship—not an unsupported claim that one channel always delivers better rates, faster decisions or easier approval.

Sources